Monday, November 30, 2015

Muslims in Sydney cop 3x the abuse of all other Aussies

A SURVEY of nearly 600 Muslims in Sydney has found they experience discrimination and abuse at a rate that's three-times higher than all other Australians.

Despite this, 86% of those surveyed felt that relations were friendly between Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia.

The survey was commissioned by Western Sydney University, the Islamic Sciences and Research Academy Australia and Charles Sturt University. It will be presented to the Australiasian Conference on Islam on Monday.

Professor Kevin Dunn of Western Sydney University told Fairfax Media the survey showed "the ordinariness of the Muslim experience and aspiration in Australia".

"Counter to what people might mistakenly believe from media coverage and a lot of debate and commentary, the vast majority of Muslims are very ordinary Australians," he told Sydney Morning Herald.

The survey found nearly two-thirds of those surveyed had been subjected to racism.
One in 10 said they had those experienced "often or very often".

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Reasons Why We Are Doomed to Lose the War Against ISIS

Kieran Turner-Dave - Blogger and Film Aficionado

............................You can't bomb ideas
 
Bombing during the American war in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos killed 2.5 million people, with millions more deaths after the war as a result of American chemical warfare. The justification for this genocidal level of killing was the fight against the ideology of Vietnamese communism. However, 40 years after that decade-long conflict, Vietnam is a country at peace that still espouses one-party communism. Despite 7 million tons of bombs being dropped during the conflict (six times the tonnage of bombs dropped by the U.S. in WWII) the idea of a unified, communist Vietnam still survived and defeated the U.S. Army.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Lebanon have all been bombed by The USA since 9/11, with the apparent objective of destroying Islamist terrorism. Yet whether it's in the form of The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, or ISIS, the ideology of Islamism still persists. The reason for this is quite simple: ideas mimetically transcend a single human life. No matter how many bombs we drop, no matter how many people we kill, Islamism will continue to exist as long as there is justification for people to fight for it. If we only provide further destruction as a response, rather than a meaningful alternative, terrorism will continue to thrive.


 



The government will continually arm radicals and tyrants
 
What do Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gadaffi, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, and The Taliban all have in common? They have all been armed at some point by the USA. The UK has also helped Saddam Hussein and Bashar al-Assad create chemical weapons - only for those same weapons to later be used as justification for military intervention. The wealthy arms trade between the West and Middle Eastern tyrants has been flourishing for decades, and continues despite many of the recipients of arms eventually using them to suppress their own people.

Even more disastrous has been the arming of fundamentalist rebel groups in attempts to overthrow governments that America doesn't like. Inevitably, the delivery of weapons into the hands of violent, disorganised and internally conflicting groups will result in those arms being used against Western interests in the future. We also arm terrorists indirectly by leaving surplus military equipment lying around after we leave a warzone. ISIS recently acquired $1billion worth of U.S. armoured vehicles left behind in Iraq to help expand their Islamic State.

We must realise that pouring billions of dollars of conventional and chemical weapons into a region gripped by tyranny and radical terror groups is only going to fuel further conflict.

Arms companies have a vested interest in war
 
In 2013, $1.75trillion was spent on the military worldwide; with the top 100 arms companies selling $402billion in weapons. The CEOs of these huge multi-national corporations are tasked with increasing profit year-on-year, and ensuring that their companies continue to grow, forever. The main client of arms companies are obviously national governments spending taxpayers' money. So the job of arms companies is not only to convince government that military spending needs to increase, but also that more weapons need to be bought every year and - in order to ensure continual demand - military equipment should be deployed as much as possible, so they can make and sell more next quarter.

The purpose of weapons companies is to make profit for their shareholders. Unfortunately, in order to do this, poor people on the other side of the world are required to have their homes destroyed and their families killed. The War On Terror was a dream come true for weapons companies. Overseen by George Bush's Vice President (and former CEO of Haliburton) Dick Cheney; a perpetual and unwinnable war guarantees healthy growth for the military industrial complex.

Billions in tax is being wasted on ineffectual military spending
Tony Benn often said: "If we can find the money to kill people, we can find the money to help people". The sad truth is that whether it's the £3.2million spent on a two-plane, six-hour bombing mission; or the hundreds of billions spent on nuclear weapons - an awful lot of taxpayers' money is spent on weapons designed to brutalise and kill other human beings.

A Watchmaker drone, operational for two hours, recently cost the UK taxpayer £1.2billion (the annual cost of benefit fraud). Then of course there is the renewal of the Trident nuclear submarines, set to cost a total of £167billion. The nuclear 'deterrent' will only be used if it is part of an arsenal that extinguishes the human race from planet Earth, and does not keep us safe from the threat of terrorism. Only nine nations possess nuclear weapons, and all except North Korea have suffered serious terrorist attacks since 9/11.

At a time when the police are facing a 25% budget cut, and hundreds of thousands of refugees are fleeing the misery inflicted by weapons we helped to create, you would think that we could put such huge sums of public money to more constructively defend against terrorism.

Two journalists arrested for story on "weapons loaded" intelligence trucks bound for Syria


Compiled Reports

Cumhuriyet Editor-in-Chief Can Dündar and the daily’s Ankara Bureau Chief Erdem Gül were arrested Nov. 26 due to a story about Turkish intelligence trucks bound for Syria in early 2014.
“We are accused of ‘spying.’ The president said [our action is] ‘treason.’ We are not traitors, spy, or heroes; we are journalists. What we have done here was a journalistic activity,” Dündar said before testifying to prosecutors Nov. 26.

Footage released by Cumhuriyet on May 29 reportedly showed gendarmerie and police officers opening crates on the back of trucks which contained what the daily described as weapons and ammunition sent to Syria by MİT in January 2014.


(Cumhuriyet publishes video for weaponry in lorries affiliated to Turkish intelligence-May 19)


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan filed an individual criminal complaint against Dündar and Cumhuriyet on June 2, claiming that the story “included some footage and information that are not factual” while saying the person “who wrote the story will pay a heavy price.”

Journalists in Turkey working for one of the major news outlets filmed intelligence trucks being unloaded with crates of weapons bound for the Turkmen inside of Syria. The Erdogan government is going after these reporters, arresting them and accusing them of faking the footage. Erdogan is leading Turkey down a dangerous path.

Friday, November 27, 2015

A switch from 'proxy' war to 'direct' war in Syria?


Yassin Aktay


The Syrian issue started to draw greater attention from the international community after the terror attacks in France. In addition to this, we can say that Westerners generally have not seen the forest for the trees. It is obvious that the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) will not end or alleviate the Syrian crisis. In this context, it can be said that, as a result of Turkey's various initiatives, even if inadequate for the time being, an international perspective – aimed at the crisis in Syria as a whole – has started to develop.

Following the draft resolution presented to the UN Security Council by France, Russia, too, presented a draft resolution to the UN Security Council regarding the crisis in Syria, yet the draft was rejected by a majority of the council members based on the grounds that it proposed cooperation with the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

In addition to this, it seems that international diplomacy aimed ending the civil war in Syria is going to mobilize recognizably in the near term.

Hence, the opinion that the home stretch has been reached in the Syria crisis is spreading. Yet it is still better to remain moderate on this matter and take note that the crisis has turned into an international fault line.
The sides in Syria have now shifted from a proxy war to a direct war. It was not before 2014 that the sides entered the ground in the Syria crisis that turned into a civil war with the escalation of violence, which began in the form of opposition protests against the regime. In other words, direct contact between international or regional powers may now be in question.

When Iran failed to prevent Assad forces from regressing in the past year after interfering in the course of the war in Syria by the hand of Hezbollah, it started to use direct force in Syria. Russia, another party to the Syria crisis, started to carry out direct operations within Syria in the second half of 2015.

Taking all this into account, it become clear that an extremely serious effort is necessary for a likely international solution in Syria. It is not impossible, but it is quite difficult without serious flexibility in the current positions of the sides. Russia is continuing to hit positions in Syria with missiles fired from submarines in the Mediterranean. Furthermore, in news reported based on information from Russian authorities, it is claimed that Russia is using cruise missiles in addition to long-range missiles when hitting these targets. There is no need to focus in length on the theory that there is more to these attacks by Russia from the east Mediterranean than the Syria crisis and ISIL problem.

The most serious question on minds regarding Syria is whether the US and Russia reached an agreement on Syria's future. Russia explaining after US Secretary of State John Kerry's statement that Turkey and the US are going to start cleaning Syria's border, that its intervention in Syria is aimed at protecting the Syrian state, not the Assad regime, and adopting a moderate approach regarding Russia's operations in Syria, strengthens these opinions. However, it could be said that assessing all this within the scope of “smart power” approach that emerged as US President Barack Obama's foreign policy paradigm, would be a more accurate analysis.
The term “smart power” was introduced as a product of “hard power,” which can be roughly defined as military power, and “soft power,” which also can be roughly defined as culture, political value and economic power elements. But the Obama administration applied the term differently than defined by Joseph Nye, who is credited with having coined the term. What Obama defined as “smart power” was already named “Ostrich Diplomacy” by opposition groups.

The vibrations caused by smart power in the US's foreign policy led to a greater radical vibration of players regarding Syria. In other words, it could be argued that the most important cause of significant failures in foreign policy of global and regional powers on Syria and regional policy for the last five years, is the US's lack of a determined attitude in its foreign policy. So, the effect of the vagueness of smart power on US foreign policy regarding intervention in areas of crisis, is felt more clearly and with impact by the other players. The power voids that appeared as a result of this were filled by terrorist organizations such as ISIL and People's Protection Units (YPG).

Everybody's ISIL to their own

When analysis is made in this way, it could be said that ISIL taking the spotlight over the real issue that has weakened US's foreign policy. We had previously mentioned that ISIL has become a medium that provides legitimacy to not only the players in Syria, but also regionally. Such that even Bashar Assad, the bloodthirsty dictator of the Syrian regime, said that he will not leave power before wiping out the ISIL threat from Syria. It seems as though ISIL's multifunctional Swiss army knife-like state has led to the following situation: Similar to Syria, every country actually has its own ISIL. Germany, France, the US, Russia, Iran, the Assad regime and even Israel all have their very own ISILs, because ISIL is a qualified skeleton key that opens all doors. It could be thought that every player, who points to only ISIL as a threat, without taking the Syrian crisis as a whole, has its own ISIL. The broadness created by ISIL leads to the failure of the US's foreign policy.

It should now be clearly stated with determination that the solution in Syria requires the end of the Assad regime as much as the necessity to fight ISIL, and policies should be centered on this. Any alternative aside from this will simply help push through alone and will not yield any outcomes.

Thursday, November 26, 2015

Muslims in Japan



Dan Evon


Contrary to popular meme, Japan has not been able to "keep Islam at bay" by enforcing strict laws on Muslims.




ORIGINS: The above-displayed meme purportedly states several factors which have allowed Japan to "keep Islam at bay," but the majority of these claims are either false or misleading.

For instance, the claim that Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims is false. According to Becoming Legally Japanese, a web site dedicated to immigration issues in Japan, the application form for Japanese citizenship does not require applicants to identify their religion:

There is no place anywhere on the written application where one specifies their religion or creed. Nor have I read anywhere about anyone being asked about their religious beliefs in the verbal interviews.

Because there is no place on the written online application for one's religion, the Ministry of Justice can't publish statistics showing the religions (or races) of naturalization candidates; they can only publish sex and former nationality statistics.

The claim that in Japan permanent residency is not given to Muslims is also false. The Guidelines for Permission for Permanent Residence published by the Immigration Bureau of Japan make no mention of religion. In fact, according to an article published by the Asian Quarterly, the Japanese government does not inquire about religion:

The Japanese government does not keep any statistics on the number of Muslims in Japan. Neither foreign residents nor ethnic Japanese are ever asked about their religion by official government agencies. While it is conceivable that this policy may change in the future due to official concerns about international terrorism, there has yet to be any public indication of such an effort. Introducing such a policy might lead to objections by the Japanese public that the government has no business inquiring into matters of religion, which is regarded by most Japanese as a strictly personal affair that should exist outside of the public sphere.

While it's true that the International University of Japan does not teach Arabic or Islamic languages (according to the university's web site, only English and Japanese language courses are offered), the country has not banned the teaching of Islamic languages. The Arabic Islamic Institute in Tokyo, for instance, offers an Arabic-Japanese translation course.

There is also no truth to the claim that that you cannot import a Koran into Japan. There are several mosques operating in Japan. and according to an article on the web site Japan Focus about Muslims living in Japan, at least one mosque teaches both Koranic studies and the Arabic language:

At the mosque in Ebina, Kanagawa Prefecture, about 10 children around age 10 are learning the Arabic alphabet. Every day from 4 pm to 8 pm, the mosque holds Koran classes. They started last November, at the urging of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims living in the area who wanted their children to be properly versed in the ancestral religion and the Arabic language. The classes are taught by the parents themselves.

Slaiman, a 39-year-old Sri Lankan who lives in neighboring Yamato and deals in used cars, sends his two sons, age 8 and 4, to classes at the mosque. He himself began studying Arabic at age 5 at a mosque school in Sir Lanka. He wants to give his own children a similar religious environment. "The Koran is written in Arabic," he says. "If the children don't learn it now they won't be able to read it properly or understand the meaning of the prayers."

Islam is not faith in isolation. It teaches faith, morality and human relations as a whole, and children must learn it early if they are to fully master it. "Japanese schools teach only knowledge — not how to be a good human being," says one Muslim father.

While the claim that Japan is the only country in the world that has a negligible number of embassies in Islamic countries hinges on the definition of "negligible," the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs maintains embassies in several predominantly Islamic countries, including Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Comoros, and Egypt.

Several of the other rumors in the above-displayed meme can be debunked by the facts previously stated, using common sense (e.g., with approximately 100,000 Muslims living in Japan it is reasonable to assume that some of them are renting apartments), or by reading the 14th article of Japan's constitution:

"All of the people are equal under the law and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic or social relations because of race, creed, sex, social status or family origin."

The one claim that the above-displayed meme did get right is the assertion that there is no Shariah Law in Japan. Article 20 of Japan's constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion to all Japan citizens, also states that religious organizations cannot exercise political authority:

No religious organization shall receive any privileges from the State, nor exercise any political authority. 2) No person shall be compelled to take part in any religious acts, celebration, rite or practice. 3) The State and its organs shall refrain from religious education or any other religious activity.

The above-displayed meme does not showcase different ways that Japan has been able to keep "Islam at bay." In fact, the country's immigration policies may have helped the Muslim population grow:

In 1982, Muslims numbered some 30,000; half of whom were native Japanese and the rest of different origins. With complete freedom of religion in Japan, the number of Muslims is expected to reach 100,000

REFUGEES AGAIN AND AGAINNNNNNN



Airlines Resent Paying Tab To Return Passengers Rejected By Canada


CP

Major Canadian airlines say they're unfairly shouldering the costs of removing from Canada people who arrive with a passport or other valid document only to be turned away by federal officials.
There are "numerous scenarios" in which air carriers must pay the tab for returning such inadmissible arrivals to their home country, Air Canada says in a submission to a federal review panel studying transportation policy.

These cases may involve people who arrive with proper documentation but are barred by Canadian authorities because they have a criminal record — something the airline would have no way of knowing — or their refugee claim is denied.

"In extreme cases, should the passenger become ill and be hospitalized before they leave Canada, carriers are even expected to pick up the medical bills," Air Canada says in its submission to the review of the Canada Transportation Act.

The legislative review is looking at the state of the national transportation system, including the aviation sector's competitiveness, service to Canadians and ability to attract visitors. A panel led by former cabinet minister David Emerson is expected to deliver a report soon.

In some cases, because of the frequently drawn-out nature of the refugee claims process, passengers may have lived in Canada for many years, and any return ticket they might have once had is no longer valid, Air Canada says.

"These passengers are often violently opposed to leaving Canada and there are significant security costs involved in these deportations, all of which are borne by the airline. In some cases, Air Canada has had to lease private jets to repatriate particularly unco-operative cases."

Any relationship that once existed between the passenger and the airline — in many cases decades ago with a predecessor company — is long lost, says Air Canada.

"The passenger is either unwilling or unable to pay. It is simply unfair to make airlines responsible for these costs, when the passenger had the required documents to travel to Canada and the passenger themselves tried to circumvent Canada's immigration programs."

When a Canadian airline transports someone abroad who is ruled inadmissible in the destination country, the airline must return the passenger to Canada or to a place where the person is admissible, such as their home country.

In cases where the person is immediately turned away, heads back to Canada and is denied entry, the Canada Border Services Agency issues a penalty of $3,200 to the air carrier. "The airline then also becomes responsible for all costs associated with returning the passenger to the country of his or her nationality," Air Canada says.

The penalty can be appealed, but the process amounts to an administrative burden for airlines, the carrier says.

In cases where passengers are turned away from Canada despite having valid travel documentation, the Canadian government should bear the cost of returning the passenger — subject to possible reimbursement from the traveller, Air Canada recommends to the panel.

Air Canada spokesman Peter Fitzpatrick said the airline had nothing to add to its submission.
The National Airlines Council of Canada, which represents Air Canada and three other large Canadian carriers, said in a statement that in such cases "the airline should not be asked to pay for the removal of the passenger."

The council added that implementation of this principle should be easier in future given pending modernization of the way passenger information will be transmitted, since it will involve the government giving an airline a green-light decision to board a traveller prior to departure.

Canada Border Services Agency spokeswoman Esme Bailey declined to make anyone available for an interview.

Monday, November 23, 2015

All are not equal in the Islamic state


- ISIS Considers Indian Recruits Inferior to Arabs, Treats Them as Cannon Fodder.



There are 23 Indians fighting with terror group ISIS in Syria and Iraq and another six are dead, says a report from a recent assessment by security agencies.

The report - drawn up with the help of the British Mi6, the Central Intelligence Agency of the USA and some Arab countries and shared at topmost level of the government - says in the ISIS, Indian, Pakistani, African and Bangladeshi fighters are considered "inferior to Arab fighters."

They are "paid less" and are given inferior equipment in comparison to their Arab and Western counterparts. "There appears to be a clear hierarchy" among the fighters and "Arabs" are preferred, the report says.
Indian, Pakistani and African fighters are also considered less motivated and therefore are generally "tricked" into carrying out "suicide bombings", the report says.

It describes how: these fighters are likely to be given an explosive-laden vehicle and asked to go near "the target and call a certain number" for further instructions. However, the phone call activates a "pre-set mechanism" triggering an explosion, the report says.

It also notes that Indians are more likely to be used as cannon fodder "forced to fight in the frontline" as they are considered expendable.

The ISIS is known to lure fighters by promising them marriage to Syrian women, but even here, Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are "lowest in the priority for Jihadi brides since they are considered ethnically inferior," the report states.

Islam in India - perhaps because of a softer approach - is considered "apostate and a departure from the original teachings of the Quran," the report says and adds that there is a "clear trust deficit" between the dominant Arab fighters and fighters from South East Asia. Hmmm.....“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” ― George Orwell

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Public help sought in identifying woman found dead in Anchorage



An artist's depiction of a woman found dead at an Anchorage homeless camp on Nov. 6, 2015. The State Medical Examiner's Office is asking for the public's help in identifying her.

State Medical Examiner Office
The Alaska State Medical Examiner's Office asked the public for help Tuesday to identify a woman found dead at an Anchorage homeless camp earlier this month.

A sketch released by the medical examiner depicts a younger woman with straight black hair. She was 4 feet, 6 inches tall and weighed 84 pounds. She had brown eyes and was between the ages of 18 and 35, said an unidentified person bulletin issued by the medical examiner's office.

The woman was found on Nov. 6 near 536 West 17th Avenue, the bulletin said.

Dawnell Smith, a spokesperson for the state health department, said the woman's cause of death remained under investigation.

The medical examiner's office rarely issues bulletins for unidentified people, she said.

"Apparently the sources that they normally use to ID people have been exhausted," she said.
The medical examiner's office asked anyone who may know the identity of the woman to call 907-334-2200.

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Argentine Ministry of Education Publishes Armenian Genocide Textbook



gargule

The Argentinian Ministry of Education presented a new textbook titled, “Armenian Genocide: Questions, Answers and Proposals for Education,” on Tuesday, November 17. The book is a teaching material produced in conjunction with the Armenian National Committee of South America.

The presentation event was attended by Education Minister Alberto Sileoni, Director of the National Institute Against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism Pedro Mouratian, and Carolina Karagueuzian, Director of Armenian National Committee of Buenos Aires, along with a number of Ministry officials.

Regarding the difficulty of teaching children about genocide, Alberto Sileoni said that, “It is not true that the products we show our children have to eliminate the complexity. There is a way and an age to present them. If anything, the respect we have for children is that all these stories do not have a happy ending like in the movies. They have it in a human, much deeper way.”

“This Ministry of Education was committed not only with the formation of the young, but also with the way the educational community has accompanied things that had been invisible for many years,” said Pedro Mouratian. “What has occurred in our country in terms of memory, truth and justice has been revolutionary and refreshing,” added.

"Carolina Karagueuzian noted that Argentina is the only country that “publishes and disseminates educational material on [the] Armenian Genocide at the federal level”.

“The material intends to address the genocide against the Armenians as one of the most atrocious events in the history of mankind, but also as one of the most important struggles of resistance to oblivion driven by the Armenian people, and accompanied by all those who sympathized with the understanding that impunity for such crimes not only involves the people who fell victim, but represents an injury to all humanity,” said Karagueuzian.

During the presentation, a chapter of “Zamba” was also presented, a child education show by PakaPaka, a TV channel of the Ministry of Education. “The amazing lesson of Zamba about Memory,” tells the journey of Zamba, the protagonist, as he visits the various genocides of the twentieth century. The journey begins with Anne Frank in Amsterdam, and continues to Mount Ararat with the Armenian poet Vahan Tekeyan. Then, Zamba and his friends meet the indigenous leader Rigoberta Menchu in Guatemala, and then Immacule Ilibagiza, a young Tutsi during the genocide in Rwanda. The chapter was aired several times this week on Argentina’s Public television network.

Friday, November 20, 2015

The Shia jihad and the death of Syria’s army



Lara Nelson


It was a hot July day in Ramadan when Khaled al-Shami saw an opportunity to flee Division 9 in Daraa, southern Syria, the place that had been his army barracks for the past four years.

One month before two soldiers like him had taken the same route, but had been spotted: one was gunned down and killed; the other was wounded and died as he was run over by the pursuing forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Their fate ran round and round Shami's head as he slipped out of the headquarters, while his friend distracted the guards. He walked five kilometres before he met soldiers from Saif Al Sham, a group in the Free Syrian Army’s Southern Front with whom he had been coordinating his defection.

It was two months before he was able to leave Syria and cross into Jordan. I met him in Amman and asked him about conditions inside Assad’s forces.

“I was living in a nightmare,” he said. “I need a software change after everything I saw and experienced. Most people like me want to leave, but it’s the overwhelming fear that stops you”.
He described what life was like inside Assad’s army.

“One important thing to realise is that there is no Syrian Army anymore, it is just militias, mostly Iranians and Lebanese.”

Composition of armed forces
Division 9 is the largest and most important military force for Assad in southern Syria. It houses the only tank division, and has around 4,000 troops within four brigades.

However, most of the troops within the division are now non-Syrians: “Without the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Lebanese Hezbollah the army could not stand up. Seventy percent of the troops in Division 9 are Iranian troops or Lebanese Hezbollah, the rest are shabiha. Only two to three percent are regular Syrian soldiers,” Khaled said.

Shabiha is the name for the Alawite paramilitary force known for its brutality and sectarian nature. Khaled described the dynamics between these different fighting elements: “The Iranians and Hezbollah are not under the control of the Syrian Army, the exact opposite.”

He described how troops were organised and deployed: “Ten high-ranking Iranian officers control the division, they plan the operations. Only Iranian or Hezbollah forces can access operations rooms, no Syrian soldiers are allowed in."

For battles, groups of 50 fighters are deployed: 15 IRGC, 15 Hezbollah, 20 Syrians, the majority of which are shabiha. Within battles the hierarchy is clear: the commander is an Iranian IRGC officer and his deputy will be a Hezbollah officer, according to Khaled.

Hierarchy
A Syrian officer who defected and is now in Amman, who asked to remain anonymous, recounted comments to me from a friend who remains an officer in Assad’s forces: “We are in the fifth class,” he said. “Even the civilian Lebanese militia have the power to tell a Syrian general what to do, to send him back to his office. They have better food than us, better weapons and more respect.”
He described how Syrians are now isolated from military activities and have no trust: “The militia are running the show nowadays. These militia believe they are there to defend Syria when the regular army has failed, so they treat us as failures with no respect.”

The difference in pay between the groups is stark: Khaled was paid $60 a month as a regular Syrian soldier, while the shabiha were paid three times as much at $180 a month. Lebanese Hezbollah were paid around $400.

Defections, desertions and fatalities
Major Abu Osama al-Jolani, a Free Syrian Army (FSA) commander and defected officer, told me how the war has changed over the past 12 months.
“The Shia militias are leading military action to support the regime in all battles for the last year … Everyone we are fighting now are foreigners.”
Christopher Kozak, at the Institute for the Study of War, wrote back in December 2014 how “defections, desertions and over 44,000 combat fatalities” had significantly reduced Assad’s forces.
He said critical pressure remains due to grumblings within the regime’s Alawi support base who “have exhibited growing signs of dissatisfaction with the Syrian regime”.

Assad publically admitted he had a manpower shortage in a speech in July this year: “The army’s energy is manpower, and if we want the army to give its best, then we need to give it our best.”

Occupation strategy
The influx of foreign fighters, many of whom are coming to Syria to fight Shia jihad, adds a dangerous sectarian character to Assad’s forces.

Khaled recounted stories of how they occupy mosques in areas they control, removing Sunni icons and putting up pictures of Shia figureheads such as the late Iranian Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Lebanese Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in their place.

“Their strategy is to spread the Shia religion. When they occupy the mosques they prevent Sunnis from praying there. They even blow up the mosque if they think the FSA are using it,” Khaled said.
Instances were recorded this year when Iraqi and Lebanese Shia militia entered the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, hung Shia flags on the wall, and began chants considered by Sunnis to be blasphemous.
Similarly when Hezbollah took over the town of Al Qusair, between Homs and the Lebanese border, a video was released showing Hezbollah fighters hanging a large flag from the minaret of the main Sunni mosque in the city which reads “Oh Hussein.”

Recently an Iraqi Shia militia group occupied a mosque in Tal al-A’is, southern Aleppo, and published pictures on their website.

Abu Salah Al Shami, leader of the FSA’s Saif Al Sham, commented on this practice saying what his fighters witness on the ground: “Often these militia try to occupy and control the religious symbols in the Sunni community to achieve not just a territorial victory but a sectarian one as well.”

These forces have been repeatedly accused of human rights atrocities, many of which are said to have had a sectarian character. Fighting alongside Hezbollah, Khaled said he witnessed crimes committed by these forces, including the rape and execution of civilians in the town of Deir al-Adas after Assad’s forces took over in February 2015.

Rights group the Syrian Network for Human Rights has issued a series of reports on the human rights abuses committed by these militias, including massacres described as ethnic cleansing. In one report they document a series of sectarian massacres between March 2011 and January 2014 that left 962 civilians dead.

Iran’s role

While Syrians I spoke to estimate that there are around 30 different foreign fighter groups on the ground in Syria supporting Assad, the bulk of their numbers is made up of fighters from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Hezbollah, as Khaled witnessed within Division 9 in the country’s south.
Major General Qasem Suleimani, the leader of the Quds Force, which handles IRGC missions abroad, regularly visits Syria, where he is seen rallying his soldiers and their fellow fighters.

A stream of senior Iranian and Hezbollah commanders have been killed in Syria. The FSA’s Major Abu Osama Al Jolani said his forces hold the bodies of two Iranian commanders killed in fighting in Quneitra, southern Syria.

The coverage of these forces in the mainstream press receives a fraction of the attention Sunni foreign fighters receive, such as those from Jabhat Al Nusra, despite some of these groups, including both Lebanese and Iraqi Hezbollah, appearing on the US foreign terror organisations list.

The US government designated the IRGC and its Quds Force a concern for the proliferation of terrorism in 2007. The role of these forces within the Syrian conflict has been tracked by Phillip Smyth, a researcher at the University of Maryland, who has issued a detailed report on the Shia jihad in Syria.

There is a major recruitment drive within radical Shia circles to recruit jihadists to fight for the Shrine of Zeinab in Syria, the burial place of the Prophet Mohammad’s granddaughter and daughter of Ali. In a recent interview Smyth outlined that Iran’s aims are not just to secure the geopolitical interests in Syria, protecting the crescent of influence from Lebanon’s Hezbollah, but it has the ideological goal to spread the Iranian Islamic Revolution in the region.

Khaled’s insights shed light on the workings of those forces supporting the Syrian regime’s foothold on power in the country. While many still refer to the “Syrian Arab Army” (SAA), it is clear that most fighters now supporting Assad are not Syrian, many are not Arab and the structure of forces is more of a conglomeration of militia than an army.

While the mainstream media is magnetised to the Hollywood horror productions of ISIS and the activities other Sunni jihadi groups in Syria, Shia jihadists in a range of militia groups have multiplied, and their dangerous sectarian policies and human rights abuses have received little attention. This wave of Shia jihad in Syria not only adds to the chaos and bloodshed in the country, but has major repercussions for sectarian tensions in the wider region for times to come.

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Remember Those ISIS Kill Lists?


Now that the Obama administration is continuing to allow Syrian refugees into the United States and that it is clear one of the Paris attackers arrived on a Syrian passport, it’s timely to remember the ISIS Kill List that became public knowledge in March.
From a CBS News report:



The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) published the list days ago, a report that contained names, photos, and home addresses of U.S. Armed Forces personnel, causing alarm in cities potentially at high-risk.

According to the publication, ISIS urges followers and sympathizers in the U.S. to kill the servicemen. Specific personnel on the list are largely from the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy – branches of the country’s military that have conducted massive air strikes against ISIS.
The air strikes have left ISIS mostly defenseless, killing over 8,000 fighters with attacks carried out on more than 5,000 targets. But ISIS appears to be fighting back through forms of social media.

The Pentagon says the the targeted appeared to be compiled from public sources — anything from news articles to Facebook posts that could have linked them to attacks on the terrorist group. Officials with the Pentagon say some members were incorrectly identified, but right or wrong, it’s still a threat.

 There have been 1,809 Syrian refugees, seeking to escape a 4-year-old civil war, admitted to the U.S. since January, according to data from the Refugee Processing Center.
Those who have been granted access to the U.S. have been placed in 130 towns and cities, according to a report in The New York Times. And most of those people have been single mothers and their children, religious minorities, or victims of violence or torture, according to The Times.
The majority of the refugees have been placed in medium-size cities as compared to large metropolitan area. Boise, Idaho, for example, has accepted more Syrian refugees than Los Angeles and New York combined.
Chief among the concerns of many people is safety.
Well, yeah. But it is medium sized US cities which ISIS is targeting:

Texas: Abilene, New Braunfels, San Antonio, Wyle, Fort Hood, Bedford, Killeen
Indiana: Michigan City, Bolivar
Michigan: Dearborn Heights, Lake Orion
Connecticut: Barkhamsted, Manchester
Nevada: Reno
Georgia: Griffin
Maryland: Upper Marlboro, Warrensburg, Lexington Park

Arizona: Phoenix

Louisiana: Shreveport, Bossier City

South Carolina: Daniel Island, Charleston

North Carolina: Fayetteville, New Bern
Virginia: Burke, Virginia Beach, Suffolk, Springfield, Norfolk, Chesapeake

Colorado: Colorado Springs

California: Hanford, Solvang, San Ardo, Monterrey, Newberry Park, Carlsbad

New Mexico: Farmington

North Dakota: Minot

South Dakota: Rapid City

Florida: Merritt Island, Palm Coast, Saint John, Middleburg, Saint Augustine

Washington: Colton, Cheney, Seattle, Spokane, Anacortes

Nebraska: Bellevue

Illinois: Orland Park

Rhode Island: Newport

Idaho: Bonners Ferry
USA Today reported this week that FBI director James Comey confirmed that there are 900 pending investigations into suspected ISIS operatives in the country. Ho many of them are in these cities?

Monday, November 16, 2015

ISIS TERROR WARNING: Britain Next to be Attacked By Jihadists, Supporters

BRITAIN is at risk from the next Islamic State attack, supporters of the evil terror group
have warned in unconfirmed tweets.
They made the chilling threats on Twitter after at least 160 people were killed by a series

of co-ordinated attacks on Paris last night.

After gloating about the horror that shocked the world, armchair jihadists tweeted that

London could be next.

The twisted tweeters also claimed to have two other major capitals in their sights –

Washington DC and Rome.

London was last hit by a terror attack in July 2005, when 52 commuters were killed by

suicide bombers linked to Islamist group al-Qaeda.

But officials have reportedly been working tirelessly to thwart ISIS attacks since the

militants declared a caliphate last summer.

Last month Andrew Parker, the head of MI5, admitted the security service can “never be

confident” in stopping all terror plots against Britain.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

ISIS...TURKISH MASK



TheTower

Turkey’s regime is trying to hide any evidence that holds Turkish leaders responsible for the support of terrorist groups, especially the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Turkish media is reporting.
Turkey officially denies all accusations that it supports activities of terrorists and allows them to pass through its territory to fight the Syrian regime. Ankara has repeatedly called for the ouster of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

The Arab news website Al-Watan Al-Arabi (Arabic link) quoted Turkish media sources as saying that West’s intention to investigate the relationship between the Turkish regime and the Islamic state organization raised Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s fears. This fear caused him to have Hakan Fidan, the head of Turkey’s intelligence service and Erdogan’s right-hand man, get rid of any evidence that could be used against him in international courts.

Erdogan reportedly instructed the intelligence agencies to hide all evidence and documents that show the involvement of the Turkish government in supporting ISIS, out of fear of being charged in international courts for supporting a terror organization.

Experts believe that Turkey turns a blind eye to militants who are going to Syria to join extremist groups via Turkish border crossings. They stress that Turkey, despite being a NATO member and having broad logistical and regulatory powers, facilitates this traffic out of hope that it will increase the possibility of the fall of Assad’s regime.

For example, some pro-Kurdish media outlets reported recently that a car bomb driven by a suicide bomber came from the Turkish border and exploded at the Syrian border crossing near Kobane, which raised questions about Turkey’s commitment to fighting ISIS. Additionally, many young men who went to fight in Syria and Iraq and then returned to their homes acknowledged that they had walked through Turkish border crossing and cooperated with “mediators” to cross into “the land of jihad.”

In addition, international officials accused the Turkish state of not doing enough to stop the fighting in Kobane, located just on the Syrian side of the border, where local Kurdish forces are battling ISIS. Analysts also say that the escape of Turks from extremist forces raises the level of concerns about coordination between the Erdogan regime and the militant jihadist groups.

Anxiety grows over ISIS recruits in USA…



tomfernandez

The Islamic State’s claim of responsibility for the attacks in Paris has potentially dramatic implications in the U.S., where federal counterterrorism officials are investigating hundreds of suspected Islamic State recruits who they fear have been urged to take their fight to American streets, authorities have said.
Last month, FBI Director James Comey acknowledged an estimated 900 active investigations pending against suspected Islamic State-inspired operatives and other home-grown violent extremists across the country.

The majority of those inquiries involve suspected Islamic State recruits, officials said, who have either been radicalized through the terror group’s aggressive social media campaign or have returned to the U.S. after being trained on battlefields in Syria and Iraq. Islamic State is also known by the acronyms ISIL and ISIS.
Comey has said that the number of inquiries has slowly climbed, largely due to the group’s successful outreach to young, disaffected Americans.

“(Islamic State) is fueling an unprecedented tempo for law enforcement authorities combating the homegrown Islamist extremist threat,” a House Homeland Security Committee threat assessment stated earlier this month, adding that almost 60 people have been arrested so far this year in ISIL-related cases.

Texas Rep. Michael McCaul, the Homeland Committee’s Republican chairman, last week called the Islamist threat a “menace” that is increasingly challenging the capacity of counterterrorism authorities.

“As this month’s terror threat snapshot illustrates, our counterterrorism and law enforcement efforts continue to be strained by these threats,” McCaul said. “With Europe accepting possibly up to 1 million (Syrian) refugees by year’s end and ISIL vowing to exploit the refugee process, our nation’s law enforcement and intelligence communities may soon be stretched as we deal with that crisis and our own Syrian refugee vetting for resettlement in the United States.”

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson acknowledged McCaul’s concerns.

“It is true that we’re not going to know a whole lot about the Syrians that come forth in this (refugee) process,” Johnson said last month. “That definitely is a challenge.”

Terrorism analyst Evan Kohlmann said that while there has been a rash of ISIL-related arrests across the country, the continuing threat in France is “many, many times greater than the U.S.”

“Many more French nationals have gone to fight as jihadists in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, and elsewhere than have Americans,” Kohlmann said. “The American Muslim community has had far less problems with radicalization than the community in France, no doubt due at least in part to higher levels of xenophobia and the often tense relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims there. Nor is France separated by vast oceans from these conflict zones, as is North America.”

Kohlmann said French jihadists tend to be better organized, armed, and connected than their comparatively diminutive American counterparts. Many (ISIL) cases in the U.S. have involved lone extremists who spend many hours online chatting with militants and who aspire to travel to a conflict zone, or are plotting to carry out their own act of violence in sympathy with the group. They do not tend to be the type of highly organized and coordinated hidden networks that were highly likely to have been behind the Paris attacks.”
U.S. Law enforcement officials have sounded more ominous warnings over the growing numbers of suspected homegrown ISIL recruits.

Comey has been particularly vocal about the potential danger, indicating that earlier this year the bureau redirected “hundreds” of investigators from criminal cases to deal with the growing national security threat.
“ISIL has used the used ubiquitous social media to break the model and push into the United States on the mobile devices of troubled souls in all 50 states a twin message: come or kill,” Comey told a House panel last month. “Come to the so-called ‘caliphate’…and if you can’t come, kill where you are.”

A measure of the government’s concern was revealed earlier this week when federal prosecutors announced charges against an Ohio man. Terrance J. McNeil, 25 of Akron, who allegedly expressed his allegiance to the ISIL, was charged with calling for the killing of U.S. military members by posting the names and addresses of about 100 service members on social media.

Specifically, prosecutors allege McNeil in September re-posted a file titled, “Islamic State Hacking Division,” which contained the names and addresses of service members described as “Target: United States Military.”
According to court documents, the file also included a directive to kill.

“Kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking that they are safe,” the text states in part.

Prosecutors allege that McNeil had repeatedly professed his support for ISIL on social media.

USA TODAY

Feds: Ohio ISIL recruit called for killing U.S. military members
“While we aggressively defend First Amendment rights, the individual arrested went far beyond free speech by reposting names and addresses of 100 U.S. service members, all with the intent to have them killed,” Stephen D. Anthony, chief of the FBI’s Cleveland Division, said this week.

Even as the Paris attacks continued to unfold Friday night, FBI officials throughout the U.S., were conferring with their local counterparts to discuss the potential implications for the U.S.

Johnson said there is no known related threat to the U.S. But law enforcement officials throughout the nation have upgraded security at transportation centers, sports stadiums and other highly-trafficked sites.
“We’re not taking any chances,” Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey said.

Friday, November 13, 2015

How the U.S. Military Engages in Public Diplomacy

U.S. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

The military’s work and diplomacy may seem to be polar opposites, but the reality is the two are closely linked. There is more to military service than fighting wars and today’s military professionals are actively engaged in public diplomacy every day.

Internationally, this is important because our service members represent the United States, particularly in places where the only Americans seen are those in uniform. Many may not know whether they're interacting with a soldier or a sailor, but those details are unimportant. At the end of the day, our service members represent the United States. This is key because military service is so much more than just warfighting.
The three pillars of the military’s public diplomacy engagement are 1) humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR); 2) multinational exercises; and 3) public affairs.

There is a type of nuanced public diplomacy in today’s military. For example, our military professionals are dedicated to HADR missions around the world. Disaster relief has become a key mission for the U.S. and a way to exercise the softer side of its military influence overseas. U.S. humanitarian assistance often includes Marines on the ground within hours or days of disaster to clear supply routes and airports, then a larger force, led by the Navy and one of its carrier groups.

HADR operations demonstrate a forward mission to provide aid where it's needed most. Although it takes place under less than ideal circumstances, our service members are still actively engaged in public diplomacy when they conduct these missions. The goals are to rebuild and provide basic necessities, but the secondary effect is public diplomacy. It's showing a side of the U.S. military that many never see.

For service members, public diplomacy is not a foreign concept. On the contrary, it’s a core part of many of the activities the U.S. military engages in on a regular basis.

In the wake of the earthquake that struck Nepal on April 25, 2015, the Nepalese government requested the U.S. government's assistance. U.S Marines from III Marine Expeditionary Force came together with other services to provide unique capabilities to assist Nepal. Military earthquake relief efforts in Nepal led by Joint Task Force (JTF) 505 were named “Operation Sahayogi Haat,” which means “Helping Hand” in Nepali.
At one point during operations, JTF 505—in tandem with the U.S. Agency for International Development—delivered approximately 49.9 tons of relief supplies, transported 273 personnel and conducted more than 68.9 hours of flight time throughout affected areas of Nepal.

Similarly, on a larger scale, the myriad multinational exercises the U.S. military participate in are a form of public diplomacy. During these exercises, U.S. forces work with partner nations in capacity building and, ultimately, relationship building. These exercises strengthen bonds and make our service members recognizable allies to foreign nations.

Look no further than USNS Mercy, the Navy’s hospital ship, and her recent deployment in support of Pacific Partnership. Pacific Partnership is an annual deployment of forces dedicated to strengthening relationships and improving disaster response skills with partners in the region.

The Pacific Partnership exercise, which includes humanitarian and civic assistance, brings to light the unique role of military public affairs. Public affairs professionals are intimately involved with ensuring these events and activities are shared not just with a curious domestic public, but also with our allies and international partners. What better demonstration of public diplomacy?

On the domestic front, there has been extensive, and well warranted, discussion of the fact that today more than ever, most civilians are far removed from military service. The argument is essentially that in today’s Iraq-Afghanistan era, everyone “supports” the troops but few know very much about them.
Telling the Navy, Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps story to the American people is an important aspect of today’s military public affairs. To that end, and perhaps most importantly, is the ability of public affairs to help bridge the increasing civilian-military divide.

On an individual level, service members are ambassadors of their respective branches of service. As such, this is important domestically in that it offers an opportunity to bridge the civilian-military divide every day.
A recent editorial published to a popular veteran-run news and culture site, “Task & Purpose,” advocated for the military having a bigger role in connecting troops to the public, and in promoting organizations that bring service members and communities together. Public affairs is an important tactic to accomplish this objective.

Public affairs has the ability to help through storytelling. By sharing what military service entails through writing, photos and videos, the public affairs work our military conducts is a unique type of public diplomacy that makes military service more relatable.

For service members, public diplomacy is not a foreign concept. On the contrary, it’s a core part of many of the activities the U.S. military engages in on a regular basis. From HADR missions to multinational exercises and public affairs, our military is actively influencing foreign publics and expanding and strengthening the relationship between the U.S. and citizens of the rest of the world--public diplomacy by definition.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Russian Airstrikes in Syria: September 30 - October 30, 2015



By Genevieve Casagrande with Jodi Brignola


Key Takeaway: The Russian air campaign in Syria reportedly expanded into the southern province of Dera’a one month after Russian airstrikes in Syria commenced. Credible local sources reported that Russian warplanes conducted overnight strikes near Tel al-Harra and other nearby villages east of the Golan Heights in Dera’a Province on October 28. Tel al-Harra is the location of a Russian signals intelligence facility, which was seized by rebels in October 2014. These airstrikes follow reports that the Syrian regime and Hezbollah reinforcements arrived in northwestern Dera’a Province on October 27. The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) did not release official airstrike reports for October 29-30. However, credible local activist sources continued to report instances of Russian airstrikes throughout Dera’a, Damascus, Homs, Idlib, and Aleppo. Russian airstrikes largely concentrated around rebel-held areas in the northern Homs countryside and within Aleppo City.

The following graphic depicts ISW’s assessment of Russian airstrike locations based on reports from local Syrian activist networks, Syrian state-run media, and statements by Russian and Western officials.